Yes, my old ModBlog avatar of W.C. Fields has finally made the move over here, larger and more irascible than ever before.
I was watching an old Fields movie (they're all old Fields movies--he's been dead since 1946) the other day. It was "Tillie and Gus," the one in which he delivers this bizarre parting line: "There comes a time in the affairs of men, my dear Blubber, when you must take the bull by the tail ... and face the situation."
The lines were funny, but so was the way he delivered, sometimes mumbled under his breath. His character was given to a florid speaking style when he wishes to proclaim something, along with bizarre names and situations. "Never give a sucker an even break"--that was his credo in many films when he played a con man--and the title of one of them.
But he was wonderful in ordinary situations, too. If you ever get a chance to see "The Man on the Flying Trapeze," don't miss it--there's a sequence when he's trying to shave and another when he has to get up during the night and tries to put his socks on. "It's a Gift" is another favorite, such as the "maternity hospital" phone call and his night trying to sleep on a swing on the back porch. I could go on.
Fields always seemed to have a shrewish wife and mother-in-law, a no-good, lazy son and a daughter who seemed to be the only one who understands him and loves him as he is. Just the ordinary trials and tribulations of life, as reflected in a funhouse mirror.
Fields originated as a juggler--some of his juggling routines are in his films--and developed into a comedian. But he could play it straight, too, as he did when he was selected to play Micawber in the 1935 version of "David Copperfield"--and played the part very well. There was a lot of interest in having him play The Wizard in "The Wizard of Oz." Frank Morgan got the part instead. He was very good in the role, but Fields would have been an absolute delight.
He did drink a lot--the topic of many of his jokes. As I started laying the foundation of my site over here, I wondered whether to stay with Fields or switch to Groucho Marx. After much dithering, I finally decided to stay with Fields--I look more like him, for one thing, and all the cartoons of Groucho I could find prominently featured his cigar.
I could have made an argument either way. Groucho was a shy person (believe it or not) and had a sharp wit. I identified with that. But Fields was a guy whom life always seemed to dump upon, for no good reason. And I identified with that, too. Besides, I learned about Fields first (maybe when I was 15 years old), and I've been a devoted fan long before even cable TV and videotapes. I recorded his films on tapes, and now I'm transferring them to DVDs.
So there you are. The avatar is now in place, and it's Mr. Fields. The more things change ...